Visit The VS-Planet Website!

Your Ad Could Be Here! Advertise With VS-Planet Now!
Click Here To Visit Our Sponsor!



VSFriend: Email This Page to Someone!
  The VS-Planet BBS
  VS-880(EX) / 890 Group
  Is it an 8 track recorder or 6 track

Post New Topic  Post A Reply
profile | register | preferences | faq | search | member pages

next newest topic | next oldest topic
Author Topic:   Is it an 8 track recorder or 6 track   Format Topic for Better Printing
Keaggyrules
VSPlanet Elite

Registered on 09-29-1999
posted 12-08-1999 08:48 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Keaggyrules   Click Here to Email Keaggyrules     Edit/Delete Message
Ok, maybe I'm missing something here. If I have recorded a song and used all 8 tracks or even 7. Does this mean that I can't bounce down to a sterio pair because there isn't any tracks left or is there a way to bounce to a sterio pair of V tracks and still use the recorded sounds on the orignal track. Lets say I have drums on tracks 7 & 8 but I want to use 7 & 8 for my destionation tracks. Can I go to the V tracks on 7 & 8 and still hear the drums on the orignal tracks? It would make more sence. Then it is a real 8 track recorder, if not then what a bummer, I should have bought the 1680.

------------------

IP: Logged

Geetarzan60
VSPlanet Elite

Registered on 06-26-1999
posted 12-09-1999 12:29 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Geetarzan60   Click Here to Email Geetarzan60     Edit/Delete Message
It depends on which machine you have. If you the original 880, you can do an 8=>2 bounce, but it has yet to be done by anyone with an 880EX. If you don't have the means to move the 8 recorded tracks into a computer or DAT, then it is a defacto 6 track. I know, I know, I was pissed at this one originally. I've decided upon a work around that works for me. I sync the drums and other keys via a sequencer at mixdown, so while I have 6 tracks recorded, I am also mixing in 2+ tracks at mixdown. Also, when I have the money, I am thinking of either upgrading to the 1680, or getting a used 880 (EX). The older 880's are apparently going pretty cheap these days, and will probably get cheaper. What I really hope (yeah, right) is that Roland deigns to give us 880EX owners the two mastering trax that it gave the 1680.

Glenn

IP: Logged

gonzo
VSPlanet Elite

Registered on 08-16-1999
posted 12-09-1999 12:56 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for gonzo   Click Here to Email gonzo     Edit/Delete Message
on my entry for the cd compilation, i used a vs880ex, and with the 6 track limit deal (internally, of course) i recorded 17 individual tracks, with another 8 pairs of submixes, for a total of 33 tracks. if i had the money, i'd have a 32 track machine! (there are some dudes here that do, with linked 1680's i'd bet) so it's all relative to what you can afford. i'd love to have more control, and maybe in the future the deal is to output to pc, but for now, it's fun trying to figure out a way to do it with what i've got.
good luck, don't be bummed.

IP: Logged

Keaggyrules
VSPlanet Elite

Registered on 09-29-1999
posted 12-09-1999 03:01 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Keaggyrules   Click Here to Email Keaggyrules     Edit/Delete Message
Thanks Roland!!! That was really Cool. I feel like I got snowed. Thats not Cool!!!

IP: Logged

Mooseboy
VS Planet Bartender

Registered on 04-24-99
posted 12-09-1999 04:26 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Mooseboy   Click Here to Email Mooseboy     Edit/Delete Message
Gonzo-

I used a total of 50 tracks for my compilation entry, all on a VS880EX. It sounds as if we work in somewhat the same fashion, with submixes.

It really is a matter of dollars vs. power. When you think of what we have on our desktops nowadays for less than $2000, you start to realize that workarounds aren't so bad.

I guess it comes from the old days, when I used to slave two Ampex half tracks together in six feet of snow to walk uphill bothways to recording school… blah blah blah.

------------------
Mooseboy
More Moose for your mouse...
my mp3.com site


IP: Logged

gonzo
VSPlanet Elite

Registered on 08-16-1999
posted 12-09-1999 05:12 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for gonzo   Click Here to Email gonzo     Edit/Delete Message
yeah, i went from a tascam 4 track to a tascam 688 midistudio to the 880ex. but i'm struggling just to get cash to get a mic (all i have is a sm57 from 1981), so i don't have to worry about g.a.s.

IP: Logged

Geetarzan60
VSPlanet Elite

Registered on 06-26-1999
posted 12-11-1999 12:41 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for Geetarzan60   Click Here to Email Geetarzan60     Edit/Delete Message
I agree with you Mooseboy. The VS's are simply the best bang for the buck, even here in Canada where the EX goes for $2,400.00 CDN. Although I am slightly pissed at having to do the work arounds, I knew I'd have to submix when I bought the machine because I use/d a minimum of 8 tracks, even in the old cassette porta 424 days. Now. Either my mixing chops are not up to snuff, yet, or my ears are telling me that there is some loss of fidelity as function of increased bouncing. This is why that I am trying to get everything done on one bounce, with the keys and the drums mixed in at the final stage. The only thing that I am submixing are the vocals. I just remixed my first song that I recorded on the VS using this M.O., and the contrast with the original is quite breathtaking. The dynamics are there, there's 'ooooph' in the drums and bass, and the guitars ring out loud and clear. There is no way on earth that I'd ever want to go back to the bad ol' cassette days. I am learning to master this beastie, and it feels great to be on the crest of the learning curve. I can do things now in a matter of seconds that took me an hour when I started. Nope, no going back for me!

IP: Logged

McThrasher
VSPlanet Elite

Registered on 04-19-99
posted 12-11-1999 02:38 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for McThrasher     Edit/Delete Message
Keaggy,

The 880 is no less an eight track than an ADAT. The 1680, to my knowledge, is the only machine to feature an "extra" two mastering tracks. Even in pro gear and eight track equals eight tracks, a sixteen track equals sixteen tracks, etc. If you want to use them to mix you lose two tracks.

That said, I sure wish Roland would give us 880EX owners the mastering tracks as well!


McThrasher

IP: Logged

Mr.Wizard
VSPlanet Elite

Registered on 11-17-1999
posted 12-11-1999 03:06 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Mr.Wizard   Click Here to Email Mr.Wizard     Edit/Delete Message
Keaggyrules and other-

I continue to see posts that say you can't bounce 8 tracks from a 880ex down to two virtual tracks. I can tell you for certain that you CAN DO IT! I've done it a number of times. I've filled all 8 tracks with my drums in stereo on 7 and 8. YOU MUST HAVE A STEREO PAIR IN ORDER FOR THIS TO WORK. I always have stereo drums but it could easily be stereo keyboards or whatever. I then bounce all 8 tracks over to virtual track 2 on 7 and 8.

Its a little tricky because you do it in two passes. The method I use is a slight variation from the 8>2 bounce I found posted on this site elsewhere. I have not gone to the trouble of documenting the process step by step but I think the key is in the channel link function. You must turn the channel link OFF. When channel link is set to on, it locks two channels together and therefore will not allow you to record just one side at a time.

In simple form - you first bounce all of the left side program material to V track 2 lets say on track 7. Then in the second pass, you bounce all of the right side program material to V-track 2 on channel 8. You now have two new virtual tracks with both sides of the mix from all 8 tracks. The new V-tracks' stereo image is opposite to way you started but that can easily be fixed using the Track Exchange to flip the V-tracks.
After all 8 tracks are full, here's an example:
On the first bounce, send tracks 1-7 to v-track 2 of track 8.
On the second bounce, send tracks 1-6 plus track 8 onto V-track 2 of track 7.

I showed a buddy how to do this and he's gone nuts. He mixed 8 down to 2, then filled 6 more tracks. Then he bounced those down to 2 and filled 6 tracks again - that's 20 tracks so far. He's now just finishing filling 6 tracks again and ready for the third bounce. That will put him at 26 tracks. I don't know where it will end.

Obviously you will have to really work at getting your submixes the way you want them from a balance standpoint. I found that when an instrument is on both sides of the stereo image, I have to pull that fader down a bit to keep it from being too loud. That makes sense actually! Since I'm making two recording passes when I do the bounce, that image is being recorded twice - a little on the left and a little on the right.

If you work at it a little, I'm sure you'll be able to do it as I did.

[This message has been edited by Mr.Wizard (edited 12-11-1999).]

IP: Logged

Geetarzan60
VSPlanet Elite

Registered on 06-26-1999
posted 12-11-1999 08:37 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Geetarzan60   Click Here to Email Geetarzan60     Edit/Delete Message
Dear Mr. Wizard,

I've tried this, with channel link 'on' to set up the routing for the stereo pair, then turned it off to attempt the 8=>2 bounce. Everything came back in MONO. Neither the relative pan locations or the FX locations were read. When I tried to do the bounce to one of the sides, the volume of the track I was trying to bounce from stayed at the same volume regardless of how it was panned. In other words, if I was bouncing the left side (track 7), there should have been absolutely no sound coming from say track 1, if I had track 1 panned hard right. This wasn't the case. What recorded onto track 7 was exactly the same regardless of where I set up the pan for track 1....

I am sure that many here would deeply appreciate it if you could give us a detailed step by step tutorial on the procedure that you are using. I know that I certainly would...

Thanks,

Glenn

IP: Logged

Mr.Wizard
VSPlanet Elite

Registered on 11-17-1999
posted 12-12-1999 09:03 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Mr.Wizard   Click Here to Email Mr.Wizard     Edit/Delete Message
Geetarzan60
Give me a couple days to document the procedure. I've been doing it from memory and just never bothered to write it down. I used this process today to mix 8 tracks down to two and it worked just fine.

There are a couple areas that I'm still experimenting with. One of those experiments is testing to see which way is best when the track you're bouncing is panned somewhere between hard right or left. I tried two methods and they both work for getting the stereo image. One of them may be a little less trouble - fewer steps.

In thinking about documenting the process, it might be a little long for a posting. I might put it in a .pdf or text file that I can send to you.

Stay tuned!

[This message has been edited by Mr.Wizard (edited 12-12-1999).]

IP: Logged

Geetarzan60
VSPlanet Elite

Registered on 06-26-1999
posted 12-13-1999 12:11 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for Geetarzan60   Click Here to Email Geetarzan60     Edit/Delete Message
Gracias, Senor Wizard. If necessary, pdf would be preferable, because I have a Mac, and the latest version of MS Word I have is 5.1. It will not read Word '98, docs...Emailing me would be fine. My address is in my profile.
And thanks. If this works, I'll buy ya a virtual Pangalactic Gargleblaster...(uh...that's a drink)

Glenn

IP: Logged

McThrasher
VSPlanet Elite

Registered on 04-19-99
posted 12-14-1999 02:39 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for McThrasher     Edit/Delete Message
Mr.Wizard sir, I too would very much appreciate knowing your method.

Thank you very much in advance.


McThrasher

IP: Logged

dantan
VSPlanet Elite

Registered on 05-16-99
posted 12-14-1999 11:17 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for dantan   Click Here to Email dantan     Edit/Delete Message
If you need a doc converted into PDF format, I'll do it for you so long as I also get a copy of the procedure...

Dan

IP: Logged

Mr.Wizard
VSPlanet Elite

Registered on 11-17-1999
posted 12-14-1999 01:09 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Mr.Wizard   Click Here to Email Mr.Wizard     Edit/Delete Message
Hey guys, here it is. Let me know how it works for you.

VS-880ex 8 to 2 Bounce
By Tony Newsom – awne@worldnet.att.net

The information below is written based on a song I worked on just a couple of hours ago to get my 8 tracks mixed down to a stereo pair. I’ll use specific track numbers but you can substitute your own track numbers. For my song, I had my stereo drums on tracks 7 (left) and 8 (right). Tracks 1-6 contained various parts panned hard left, hard right, and in between.

There are a couple things to remember – 1. You MUST have a stereo pair (1-2, 3-4, 5-6, or 7-8) in your 8 tracks to be mixed. 2. You should have the effects already recorded in your tracks. 3. You should get your mix all set up BEFORE using this procedure. Put your faders where you want them. Here we go!

1. Set the destination V.Track
a. Press SHIFT + V.Track buttons
b. Press SELECT CH EDIT button for track 7
c. Rotate wheel to select V.Track 2

2. Press PARAMETER until Channel Link = appears, use the wheel to select OFF

3. Press PARAMETER until MIX SW = appears, use the wheel to select ON

4. Press the PLAY DISPLAY button.
5. Turn off all STATUS buttons. No lights.

6. While pressing STOP, press the STATUS buttons for the tracks you want to bounce.
This is important: Since track 7 is my left side of the stereo field, the buttons I will select for this step are all the RIGHT side tracks PLUS any tracks that are panned in between.

7. Press the STATUS button for track 7 until it glows orange.

8. Press the FADER EDIT button until green. It may already be green.

9. Press and hold the STATUS button for track 7. You should see the SELECT CH EDIT button flash for the tracks you’ve selected for the bounce. You can add or delete tracks as needed.

10. Press FADER EDIT button until orange.

11. Press and hold STATUS button for track 7 and Only the SELECT CH EDIT button for track 7 should blink. Turn off any others that glow.

REMEMBER: At this point, make sure your mix is ready to go with the track faders, pans, and Master levels set to where you want them. YOU SHOULD NOT TOUCH THEM AGAIN UNTIL AFTER YOU'VE COMPLETED THE SECOND PASS.

12. Press ZERO to get to the top of the song.

13. Press PLAY and should hear the tracks you’ve selected from one side of your earphones or speaker system. You are only hearing part of the total mix.

14. Press STOP and then ZERO to get back to the Top of the song.

15. While holding down the REC button, press the STATUS button for track 7. It should blink red.

16. Now Press the REC button again – it should blink red.

17. Press PLAY to start recording. Press STOP when the song ends.

You’ve just completed the first pass and recorded one side of the stereo mix.
DON”T MOVE ANY OF THE FADERS!

18. Press the FADER EDIT button until it turns green.

19. Set track 7 back to V.Track 1.

THE SECOND PASS -
All you have to do now is start at step one again but this time you should substitute track 8 whenever you see 7 in these directions. Remember that your tracks may be different if your stereo pair is something other than 7 and 8. Since track 8 is my right side, I will select all the left side tracks plus the in between tracks for the second pass.

Once you’ve completed the second pass, you should have all 8 tracks mixed down to stereo on V.Tracks 7-2 and 8-2. To hear the results, set V.Tracks 7-2 and 8-2 so that you can hear them. Turn off all the other tracks (buttons dark). What I usually do here is set up a SCENE for my two V.Tracks. I also have a SCENE for all 8 tracks. This way I can switch quickly between scenes and compare all 8 tracks to my stereo V.Tracks.

TRACK EXCHANGE –
There’s only one thing left to do. You will notice that your stereo mix is opposite to the way all 8 tracks sound. Remember that we switched right with left when you bounced the tracks. You can use TRACK EXCHANGE to put the stereo image back to the way it was. See page 92 of your manual for Track Exchange. This posting is long enough as it is.

If you want to copy all of this, simply use your mouse to paint all the words and then use Copy and Paste to put it in your word processor. Then you can print it out. I tried to cut this down as much as possible without making it confusing. Give me your feedback. If I need to go into more detail, it might have to go into an Acrobat pdf file.

[This message has been edited by Mr.Wizard (edited 12-14-1999).]

IP: Logged

Dino

posted 12-14-1999 01:41 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Dino   Click Here to Email Dino     Edit/Delete Message
The easy way for those so equipped is to dump to a computer digitally.

IP: Logged

Mr.Wizard
VSPlanet Elite

Registered on 11-17-1999
posted 12-14-1999 01:59 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Mr.Wizard   Click Here to Email Mr.Wizard     Edit/Delete Message
Dino -
You are correct IF you can transfer the data digitally. Most PC's can't do this. One other factor to consider is MIDI. If you are using MIDI somewhere is your tracks, sending it to a PC may cause you to loose the MIDI capability - unless of course the PC is also equipped with a MIDi interface and software. If your PC can't send and receive digital information, you might have to go through an digital to analog conversion and back again to get it back into the VS. Using a PC will certainly work, I've done it many times myself. Sometimes one method will have an advantage over the other based on the requirements of the job.

Hey, there are probably a hundred ways to get the same job done. None of them are right or wrong, they're just different.

IP: Logged

Geetarzan60
VSPlanet Elite

Registered on 06-26-1999
posted 12-14-1999 02:00 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Geetarzan60   Click Here to Email Geetarzan60     Edit/Delete Message
Thank you Mr.Wiz,

I'll give it a try either tonight or tomorrow. There's one thing that I am unclear about though, and that's this bidness regarding having the FX recorded to the trax to begin with. Are you saying that the trax to be bounced have to be recorded with FX inserted, and that you can't use them send/return by routing them to trax 7-8?

Thanks again,

Glenn

IP: Logged

Mr.Wizard
VSPlanet Elite

Registered on 11-17-1999
posted 12-14-1999 02:31 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Mr.Wizard   Click Here to Email Mr.Wizard     Edit/Delete Message
Geetarzan60-
I only stated that you should have your effects already recorded for simplicity. I don't see why you couldn't do as you suggested with using send and return. The process might be complicated however if you are using stereo effects. That would require that two tracks be in the record mode when using that effect. Remember, I have to turn Channel Link OFF so that I can record one side of the mix. A MONO effect shouldn't be a problem. I must admit that I have not had the time to really experiment with using the effects this way. I tend to record the effects I want on each track. That way I can keep using the effects on other tracks. When I get to the real final mix, I can use the effects for all tracks - maybe for a little reverb overall.

There are a lot of ways to skin this cat.

[This message has been edited by Mr.Wizard (edited 12-14-1999).]

IP: Logged

Geetarzan60
VSPlanet Elite

Registered on 06-26-1999
posted 12-14-1999 04:25 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Geetarzan60   Click Here to Email Geetarzan60     Edit/Delete Message
Thanks again, Mr Wiz,
I'll let y'all know how it works!

Glenn

IP: Logged

stratcat
VSPlanet Elite

Registered on 02-17-2000
posted 02-18-2000 02:27 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for stratcat   Click Here to Email stratcat     Edit/Delete Message
I see someone stated that the original 880 can do a 8 track to 2 track bounce?? Do you bounce them all to 2 new virtual tracks?
Thakns

IP: Logged

stratcat
VSPlanet Elite

Registered on 02-17-2000
posted 02-18-2000 02:44 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for stratcat   Click Here to Email stratcat     Edit/Delete Message
OK I am an idiot!! Sorry, I typed before I finished reading all te posts. obviously, the answer I was looking for was already posted.

SORRY & thanks for the info!!

IP: Logged

Boone
VSPlanet Elite

Registered on 02-15-2000
posted 02-19-2000 10:40 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for Boone     Edit/Delete Message
Hey, Wiz. I've decided to give this a try. It looks like you're using my style of procedure writing,too. Cool. I wish more folks would document some procedures that aren't covered in the Dan Barnes O.P.

I'll let you know how it turns out. I've always been sceptical of the 8 to 2, but I'll try it.

If I get in trouble, I'll holler, "Help Mr. Wizard, Help Mr. Wizard..."

And you can say, "Tudor, Tudor, Tudor. How many times must I tell you? Be vaht you is, not vaht you is not."

IP: Logged

LarryLurex
VSPlanet Elite

Registered on 12-30-1999
posted 02-20-2000 02:50 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for LarryLurex   Click Here to Email LarryLurex     Edit/Delete Message
This is definitely an 8 track. With analogue tape recorders, once you fill up the 8 tracks you must bounce that all down to another machine all together. That's how it works. It's still an 8 track.

At least with this machine you CAN bounce it down all on the same machine (love those virtual tracks!). It just takes a little working around to do it. I am hoping there will be an upgrade with the 2 mastering tracks soon!

I haven't tried Mr. Wizard's method yet, but I have always had a different method I've used for the 8>2 bounce.

I take four tracks and bounce those down to two on whatever virtual tracks, then I take the other four tracks and bounce those down to two other virtual tracks. Then I bounce the four submixed tracks down to 2, which become the master stereo tracks.

We definitely all need to unite to get Roland to make an upgrade for our 880s so that we can be able to play all 8 tracks while recording to 2 other v-tracks. That shouldn't be too difficult.

I will have to admit that when I bought my 880EX, I was fully under the impression that you COULD bounce all 8 tracks down to 2 in one shot. I was PISSED when I found out I could not!

[This message has been edited by LarryLurex (edited 02-20-2000).]

IP: Logged

SputnikBoo
VSPlanet Elite

Registered on 01-04-2000
posted 02-20-2000 05:27 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for SputnikBoo   Click Here to Email SputnikBoo     Edit/Delete Message
Hi All,
I would like to suggest an alternate 8-2 Track mixdown that I believe would get around some of the limitations of the Left Side followed by Right side method.

THE SHORT VERSION:
1.) Track Exchange Track1-Vtrack1 and Track2-V1 to T3-V2 and T4-V2.
Original tracks now located as follows:
v2 - xx12xxxx
v1 - xx345678
2.) Channel Link Track 1 and 2 if not already
3.) Mixdown tracks 3,4,5,6,7,8 to 1,2 pair
4.) Switch to Vtrack2 for channels 3 and 4 (these are your original tracks 1 and 2)
5.) Overdub 3 and 4 onto the track 1,2 pair.

DONE

I understand from previous posts that step 5, overdub, can only be done with the 880EX (sorry 880 and VXers)

Benefits:
1. saves steps
2. can ride faders and change panning at
mixdown (no can do with VS guide method).
3. No need to swap left right when done.
4. The "MUST HAVE at least one stereo pair" requirment eliminated.
5. Can use different EFX settings for each pass. (Light bulbs going off?!)

NOTE This method cannot be used to mix down to 5,6 or 7,8 - (Subject for another post)

Let me know if this works for you. Gladly will write up details if enough interest.

Sputnik

IP: Logged

zerotosixty
VSP Newbie

Registered on 02-14-2000
posted 04-01-2000 01:19 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for zerotosixty   Click Here to Email zerotosixty     Edit/Delete Message
When you bounce everything to a pair of mastering track, or equivilent to. Do you still get where the tracks are panned. (i.e.) say I record 1 guitar part hard left, and another hard right so that it will start out with guitar 1 on your right ear, then the other guitar will come in on the left. (Am I making sense?) Anyways, I was just wondering if that would show up on the mastered tracks.

IP: Logged

LarryLurex
VSPlanet Elite

Registered on 12-30-1999
posted 04-01-2000 02:44 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for LarryLurex   Click Here to Email LarryLurex     Edit/Delete Message
Yes, the panning will come out right. However, if you mess with the panning while mixing down you may get a funny sound in the mix.

I like to do sweeping panning effects in my songs everyone in a while, but for some reason this machine likes to add little noises when you move the pan knobs during a mix-bounce. This doesn't happen all the time, but it has happened.

IP: Logged

All times are ET (US)

next newest topic | next oldest topic

Administrative Options: | |
Post New Topic  Post A Reply
Hop to:

Contact Us | VS-Planet Website

©Copyright Of VS-Planet, 2001

Powered by: Ultimate Bulletin Board, Version 5.39c
© Infopop Corporation (formerly Madrona Park, Inc.), 1998 - 1999.

Your Ad Could Be Here! Advertise With VS-Planet Now!
Click Here To Visit Our Sponsor!